Smt Anushka v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous based on the submission of the applicant's counsel.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:116792
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2042 of 2021
Applicant :- Smt Anushka Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sharad Saran Srivastava
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that present application has become infructuous.
- In view of that, present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as being infructuous.
Order Date :- 24.5.2023 Nitika Sri.
Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Smt Anushka
Coram
Nalin Kumar Srivastava J
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/2042/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court