The Hon'ble Court rejected the anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested and granted regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2226 of 2021
Applicant :- Sabrez @ Munna Metro Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Shankar Tripathi,Rajneesh Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has already arrested and granted regular bail, therefore, this application has become infructuous.
Hence, there is no justification or need to proceed further in the matter, the application is rejected as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.4.2023 Fhd
Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application is liable to be rejected as infructuous after the appointment of regular bail.
Sabrez @ Munna Metro
State of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
