Disposed

Sonvir Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Jan 2023ABAIL/2122/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of an application for anticipatory bail under S. 438 Cr.P.C. The applicant withdrew the application, seeking liberty to file a regular bail application. The court directed surrender within six weeks and ordered interim protection against coercive action.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file regular bail application on surrender within six weeks; no coercive action during interim period if not surrendered.

Sonvir Singh Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 77 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2122 of 2020 Applicant :- Sonvir Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashma Dwivedi,Ram Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Aishwarya Pratap Singh

¶2

Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.

¶3

The case is taken up in the revised list.

¶4

Heard Sri Ram Kumar, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri K.P. Pathak, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶5

The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 46 of 2020, under Sections 406, 506 IPC, P.S. Highway, District-Mathura , with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶6

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant. He has also pointed out that the charge sheet has been submitted in the case on 10.07.2020.

¶8

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within six weeks from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶9

For the period of six weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶10

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of .

¶11

Order Date :- 10.1.2023/Jitendra/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sonvir Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonvir Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Jyoti Rastogi Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sahil Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Akhlakh Ahmad Vs State of U.P.

Sultan and 11 Others Vs State of U.P.

Veer Singh @Dharmendra Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P.

Satendra Singh Tomar Vs State of U.P. 2 Others