Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application treated as withdrawn. Directed applicant to surrender within one month. Regular bail to be decided per Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil case.
Application disposed as withdrawn. Direction to surrender within one month; liberty to file regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1589 of 2023
Applicant :- Ram Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhiraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Heard Sri Dhiraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.
The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.618 of 2022, under Sections 420, 406, 504, 506, 452 I.P.C., P.S. Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur.
After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.
In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .
For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.
With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of .
Order Date :- 23.3.2023/ Vikas
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application may be treated as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶7
2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ram Kumar
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Krishan Pahal
Parties & counsel
