Anisha Devi v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This application was dismissed as infructuous because the final report had been submitted against the applicant.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This application was dismissed as infructuous because the final report had been submitted against the applicant.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1359 of 2023
Applicant :- Anisha Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Sheel Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Mr. Ram Sheel Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant states that this application has become infructuous as the final report has been submitted against the applicant.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 7.2.2023 Jitendra/-
Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anisha Devi
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court