Jishan Ali v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant admitted bypassing the lower court and withdrew his anticipatory bail prayer; the application was dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13578 of 2022
Applicant :- Jishan Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Deep Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Heard Sri Krishna Deep Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri O.P. Mishra, learned AGA for the State.
At the very outset, it is admitted by the applicant that he has approached this Court directly by-passing the jurisdiction/competent court below.
In these circumstances, the applicant seeks not to press this anticipatory bail application, hence it is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application before the competent court below as per law.
Order Date :- 10.2.2023 #Vikram/-
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Jishan Ali
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/13578/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court