The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed an anticipatory bail application as having become infructuous because the applicant sought to drop the plea.
Application dismissed as infructuous upon applicant's request to drop the plea.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12728 of 2022
Applicant :- Hakeem Azad Jarrah Alias Azad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sandeep Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Sri Vivek Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sandeep Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the first informant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
The applicant seeks not to press this anticipatory bail application as having become infructuous.
Hence, it is dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 9.2.2023 Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Hakeem Azad Jarrah Alias Azad
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
