This single-judge order dismisses an anticipatory bail application as infructuous on the ground that the underlying disputes between the parties have been amicably settled and there is no apprehension of arrest.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1355 of 2021
Applicant :- Vipin Dixit @ Sonu And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Kumar Shukla,Dr. Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjay Kumar Dubey
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Sanjay Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the parties have amicably settled their disputes and there is no apprehension of arrest of the applicants.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as infructuous.
[D.K. SINGH, J.]
Order Date :- 23.2.2023 CS/-
Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail application is maintainable as the dispute has been amicably settled and apprehension of arrest is non-existent.
Vipin Dixit @ Sonu And 4 Others
State of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
