Allowed

Sarves Devi v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC8 Dec 2023ABAIL/13534/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to Sarves Devi in a criminal trial under Sections 438 Cr.P.C. The court issued conditions, including a personal bond and restrictions on leaving the country or missing court dates, guided by the Supreme Court judgment in Sushila Aggarwal.

What did the court decide?

The applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail till the conclusion of trial by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/ with two sureties each by complying with specified conditions.

Sarves Devi Vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:232835

¶2

Court No. - 71

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13534 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Sarves Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- S.S. Rajput Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶6

Heard Mr. S.S. Rajput, learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

¶7

This anticipatory bail application (under section 438 Cr.P.C.) has been moved seeking bail in Case Crime No.319 of 2021 arising in Case No.4592 of 2022, under Sections 452, 323, 308 and 504 IPC, Police Station Pali Mukimpur, District Aligarh.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case just to harass the applicant.The applicant is a lady aged about 57 years. As per allegation, accused Sohan Singh, Akash, Ankit and Sarvesh Devi armed with Lathi, Danda and Iron Rod, entered into the house of the informant and beaten his father, mother, sister and brother Puneet, as a result of which, Punet sustained injures but as per injury report, all injuries are simple in nature. He further submits that the entire family of the applicant has been roped in the present case. Investigation has been completed and charge sheet has already been submitted. He further submits that the applicant is having no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph 20 of the affidavit..

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicant.

¶10

Hence without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of applicant, she is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail as per the Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi) 2020 SCC Online SC 98 . The future contingencies regarding anticipatory bail being granted to applicant shall also be taken care of as per the aforesaid

¶11

judgment of the Apex Court.

¶12

In the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail. Let the applicant- Sarves Devi, involved in the aforesaid crime be released on anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶13

(i) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

¶14

(ii) The applicant shall not leave the country during the currency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court.

¶15

(iii) The applicant shall surrender her passport, if any, to the concerned Court forthwith. Her passport will remain in custody of the concerned Court.

¶16

(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.

¶17

(v) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail, the Court concerned may take appropriate action in accordance with law and judgment of Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi) 2020 SCC Online SC 98 .

¶18

(vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of her bail and proceed against her in accordance with law.

¶19

In default or misuse of any of the conditions, the Public Prosecutor/ Investigating Officer/ first informant-complainant is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶20

With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the application is disposed of.

¶21

Order Date :- 8.12.2023

¶22

Ajeet

¶23

Digitally signed by :- AJEET KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sarves Devi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarves Devi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shamshad Vs State of U.P.

Mohammad Mahmood Akhtar Vs State of U.P.

Devesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vishal Lohia Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pooran Singh Saini Vs State of U.P.

Sayed Farhat Hussain Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others