Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested, making further proceedings unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13527 of 2022
Applicant :- Keshav Ughan Jha Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Siddhartha Baghel,Prateek Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Achal Singh
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Order Date :- 18.4.2023 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Keshav Ughan Jha
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
