Disposed

Sanjeev Manchanda v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Apr 2023ABAIL/13132/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the anticipatory bail application with liberty to file a regular bail application, directing the applicant to surrender within one month. The regular bail application was to be decided in light of the Supreme Court's guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil. No coercive action was permitted during the surrender period.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with liberty to file regular bail; applicant directed to surrender within one month; no coercive action during period.

Sanjeev Manchanda Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 83

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13132 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Sanjeev Manchanda Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Komal Mehrotra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

List has been revised.

¶6

Heard Sri Achintya Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Komal Mehrotra, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri R.M. Yadav, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶7

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.5 of 2020, under Sections 420, 406, 120B and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Badalpur, District Gautam Budh Nagar.

¶8

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶11

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶12

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of .

¶13

(Krishan Pahal, J.)

¶14

Order Date :- 18.4.2023 Ravi Kant

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sanjeev Manchanda v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Manchanda v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak and Another Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Sangita and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shakeel and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shubham Gupta Vs State of U.P. and Another

Furkan Vs State of U.P.

Keshav Ughan Jha Vs State of U.P. and Another