Smt Kiran and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Annales, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad refused anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., holding that the application was not a fit case given the serious allegations and the applicant's criminal history.
What did the court decide?
Interpretanties anticipatory bail application rejected.
What the court decided
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13029 of 2022
Applicant :- Smt Kiran And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Singh Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dhirendra Kumar Verma
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
- Heard Virendra Singh Patel, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Dhirendra Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the first informant, learned AGA for the State and perused the papers on record.
- The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no. 181 of 2022, u/s 306 I.P.C., P.S. Tahrauli, District Jhansi.
- As per prosecution case, the first informant's father (applicant No.2) used to bring one Kiran (applicant No.1) to his house. The first informant and his mother used to object but the applicants did not desist, instead the first informant's mother was manhandled, physically assaulted and abused by the applicants. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that the first informant, when he returned to his house, found his mother lying on the ground and was looking puzzled and stressed. The first informant asked for the reason and she said that she had consumed some poison due to torture by the applicants. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that she was taken to the hospital, however, she died the same day.
- It is contended on behalf of the applicants that the first informant himself has given an affidavit before the S.S.P., Jhansi stating therein that his mother was not in right mental state and he took her to the hospital on the information given by the covillagers. On the basis of the above affidavit, it is contended that the applicants have been exonerated by the first informant himself and in such circumstances, as no good evidence is available on record against them, they deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicants are entitled to anticipatory bail in the case of alleged suicide/murder of a female relative.
Whether the disclosure by the first informant in an affidavit exonerates the applicants from criminal liability.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kirans
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Jyotsna Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/13029/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court