Rakesh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application was dismissed on withdrawal filed by the applicant, as no other substantive legal issues were addressed in this order.
Anticipatory bail application was dismissed on withdrawal filed by the applicant, as no other substantive legal issues were addressed in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12869 of 2022
Applicant :- Rakesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Upadhyay,Ajay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw this anticipatory bail as having become infructious.
Hence, this anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 21.2.2023 Asha
Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakesh
State of U.P.
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court