The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad disposed of an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by Sukhpal against the State of U.P. The court held that the application was not maintainable as the underlying offence under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act is bailable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:210939
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12114 of 2023
Applicant :- Sukhpal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Shalini
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is maintainable for an offence under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act which is bailable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sukhpal
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
