Disposed

Rajeev v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC3 Nov 2023ABAIL/12085/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application by directing the applicant to surrender before the court below within one month. The court also directed that any subsequent regular bail application be decided in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed; applicant directed to surrender within one month; no coercive action allowed during this period.

Rajeev Vs State of U.P. and Another — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:211177

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12085 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Rajeev Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dr. C.P. Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Dr. C.P. Upadhyay, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Shakil Ahmad, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case No.7619 of 2017, arising out of Case Crime No.60 of 2023, under Sections 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 420, 467, 468 I.P.C. and Section 60/62 of Excise Act, Police Station- Bhopa, DistrictMuzaffarnagar.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the matter pertains to Excise Act alongwith allied sections of Indian Penal Code, as such, applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the applicant after arguing for some time submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Vikas

¶14

[Krishan Pahal, J.]

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajeev v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajeev v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P.

Mukul Vs State of U.P.

Wasim Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Nazmeen Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sukhpal Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Lakhan Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another