The Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application. The court noted the applicant faced no arrest apprehension under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and referenced Arunesh Kumar; consequently, the application was not allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:186371
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10482 of 2023
Applicant :- Ram Babu Yadav @ Baburam And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kumar Anish Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273 . The Court also takes into account the submission made by the learned A.G.A. that the accused applicant has no apprehension of arrest in this matter.
Order Date :- 25.9.2023 ss
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to applicants falsely implicated in an offence punishable with seven years imprisonment given protection under Section 41-A Cr.P.C.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh KumarReferred¶11
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Ram Babu Yadav @ Baburam and Another
State of U.P. and Another
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
