The Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. holding that notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. had already been issued, dispelling apprehension of arrest, thus rendering further proceedings unnecessary.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as notice u/s 41-A had been served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:184455
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9536 of 2023
Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Vishwakarma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Mani Tiwari,Amit Singh,Shiv Charan Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sandeep Kumar
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 22.9.2023 Shivangi
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application requires consideration given that notice u/s 41-A has been served.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Kumar Vishwakarma
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
