The Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C. by directing the applicant to surrender within one month and to file a regular bail application, to be decided in light of Satender Kumar Antil principles.
Applicant directed to surrender within one month; no coercive action during interim period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:189902
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10321 of 2023
Applicant :- Manish Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shubham Prakash Gupta,Mukesh Chandra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 4.10.2023 Ravi Kant
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application.
Whether coercive action shall be taken against the applicant for one month.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825Referred¶4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manish
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Krishan Pahal
Parties & counsel
