This court disposed of the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by directing the applicant to file a regular bail application within six weeks. No case was made for interference under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Directions to file a regular bail application within six weeks; no coercive action during this period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:176780
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9843 of 2023
Applicant :- Govardhan Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 12.9.2023 Shalini
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. considering the guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil.
Whether a regular bail application should be filed within six weeks.
Whether coercive action should be restrained against the applicant during the six-week period.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶9
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Satender Kumar AntilReferred¶11
Satender Kumar Antil (supra)
Govardhan Singh
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
