This is a thin order in an application under Section 482 CrPC. The applicant failed to appear on the first listed date and again on the current date. The court dismissed the application for lack of prosecution without recording reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9640 of 2023
Applicant :- Ram Kumar Nishad @ Ram Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dharm Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
On 31.03.2023, the following order was made:
"Case called on. No one appears for the applicant.
The case is adjourned to 10.04.2023."
Today also, there is no appearance on behalf of the applicant when the case called on.
This application is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 10.4.2023 Vijay
Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Kumar Nishad @ Ram Kumar
State Of U.P.
J.J. Munir
Vijay Kumar Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
