Mausam Ali v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In a Section 482 CrPC application, the applicant failed to appear even at the revised call date. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution without hearing.
In a Section 482 CrPC application, the applicant failed to appear even at the revised call date. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution without hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8542 of 2022
Applicant :- Mausam Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
None appears for the applicant even in the revised call.
Accordingly, this application under Section 482 CrPC is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 2.1.2023 Shahroz
Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mausam Ali
State Of U.P.
Umesh Chandra Sharma
Shahroz Alam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court