The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC because the applicant's counsel stated they did not wish to press the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8142 of 2021
Applicant :- Pinku @ Shyam Govind Pathak And 7 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Anand Pati Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant does not want to press this application and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of statement of learned counsel for the applicants, the application U/S 482 is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 27.4.2023 Virendra
Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pinku @ Shyam Govind Pathak And 7 Others
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
