Single judge order dismissing an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for want of prosecution due to repeated non-appearance of the applicant to press the matter before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5279 of 2007
Applicant :- Narendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shabana Nizam Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
Order Date :- 8.12.2023 Ashish Pd.
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the application to quash proceedings should be allowed despite non-appearance of the applicant.
Whether the order dismissing the application for want of prosecution is sustainable.
How to proceed when an applicant does not appear to press an application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. on repeated adjournments.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narendra Kumar
State of U.P.
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
