Dismissed

Ranu and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC2 Mar 2023A482/43052/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application. The applicants relinquished the quashing prayer, preferring to seek bail based on Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines. The Court directed that no coercive action be taken for four weeks if bail is filed.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action to be taken for four weeks if bail application is filed by the given date.

Ranu and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 72

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 43052 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Ranu And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the impugned charge-sheet dated 13.5.2022 Case Crime No. 96 of 2021 in Case No. 29114 of 2022 (State Vs. Ranu and Others) under Section 147, 148, 149, 452, 323, 504, 506, 325 I.P.C., Police Station- Narkhi District- Firozabad.

¶7

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants relinquish the prayer for quashment and wish to move bail application before the trial court in view of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in ( 2021) 10 SCC 773.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection.

¶9

Considering the above submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the court concerned within four weeks from today and move application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra).

¶10

For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

¶11

It is made clear that in the event no such application is moved within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicants.

¶12

With the above direction, the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 2.3.2023 S.Verma

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ranu and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranu and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Firm M/S. Raj Musico Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Babali Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mahesh Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Savitesh Madhulika Sharma Vs State of U.P and Another