The High Court disposed of the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. advising the court below to promptly decide the applicant's bail application, citing the precedent set by Satender Kumar Antil, without the applicant seeking quashing.
A direction was issued to the court below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:114192
Court No. - 70
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42282 of 2022
Applicant :- Shahrukh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 24.5.2023/A.
Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to the court below to decide the bail application expeditiously as per the judgment in Satender Kumar Antil.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2021 SCC Online SC 922. · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahrukh
State Of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
