Dismissed

Sheshnath Yadav and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC20 Nov 2023A482/42276/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused to allow a Section 482 CrPC application quashing proceedings or expediting bail on merit as counsel did not press the relief. The court directed surrender within three weeks and expedited bail consideration citing Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Relief sought on merits was refused; applicants directed to surrender within three weeks for bail consideration.

Sheshnath Yadav and 5 Others Vs State of U.P… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:219493

¶2

Court No. - 89

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42276 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Sheshnath Yadav And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the charge-sheet dated 29.01.2022, summoning order dated 22.10.2022 as well as entire proceedings in Case No.34337 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No.301 of 2021, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 325 I.P.C., P.S.Barhalganj, District Gorakhpur.

¶8

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that applicants shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶12

For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 20.11.2023/SKD

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sheshnath Yadav and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheshnath Yadav and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Javed and 23 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajendra Kumar and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Arun Kumar Jaiswal Vs State of U.P. and Another

Subhash and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Wasim Warsi Vs State of U.P.and Another

Ashish and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another