In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash FIR and summons order, counsel for the applicant did not press the relief on merit, instead seeking quick bail decision. The court refused the quash petition but directed surrender and expeditious bail hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:218992
Court No. - 89
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41812 of 2023
Applicant :- Javed And 23 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.
Order Date :- 17.11.2023 Prajapati
Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherApplied¶11
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another [2021 SCC OnLine SC 922] · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Javed And 23 Others
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
