Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. allowed to be dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant was absent even during a revised listing.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40015 of 2022
Applicant :- Nityanand Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Karunesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
None is present for the applicant even in revised list, whereas learned counsel for opposite party no.2 is present.
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 25.1.2023 Radhika
Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nityanand Srivastava
State of U.P.
Sadhna Rani (Thakur)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
