Disposed

Ramod and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC15 Feb 2023A482/39899/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench considered an application to quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Deferring to the Apex Court's guidelines in Satendra Kumar Antil, the court reduced the application to a bail application to be filed within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Applicants granted four weeks to move a bail application; no coercive action in that period; quashment application dismissed if bail not filed.

Ramod and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 72

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39899 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Ramod And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shri Ram (Rawat),Giri Ram Rawat,Indra Deo Mishra

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the charge-sheet dated 18.02.2022 including entire criminal proceeding pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad in Case No. 1432 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 264 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 324, I.P.C of Police Station Jahan Ganj, District Farrukhabad.

¶8

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicant relinquish the prayer for quashment and wish to move bail application before the trial court in view of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection.

¶10

Considering the above submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the court concerned within four weeks from today and move application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra).

¶11

For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

¶12

It is made clear that in the event no such application is moved within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicants.

¶13

With the above direction, the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 15.2.2023 Vinod.

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramod and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramod and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Sunita Sharma Vs State of U.P. and Another

Lakshya Aeron Vs State of U.P. and Another

Geeta Kumari Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Pinki and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Chandra Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Krishan Murari Vs State of U.P. and Another