The applicant sought to expedite the disposal of their bail application. The applicant did not press the substantive relief. The court refused the relief and directed surrender with expeditious bail disposal.
Refused main prayer; directed surrender within three weeks and expeditious decision of bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:205457
Court No. - 89
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39554 of 2023
Applicant :- Shiv Pratap Singh @ Kallu And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Swati Singh,Birendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Nitin Verma
Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant the application by virtue of which bail application must be disposed expeditiously.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationExplained¶6
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922 · Who else cites this
Shiv Pratap Singh @ Kallu And 5 Others
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
