Disposed

Shyodan Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC27 Oct 2023A482/39430/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant applied to quash criminal proceedings, failing to press the plea on merit. Instead, he sought expeditious disposal of an unrelated bail application. The court refused the quashing. It directed the applicant to surrender and obtained a promise for expedited bail decision without coercive action.

What did the court decide?

Relief of quashing refused; applicant directed to surrender; no coercive action for three weeks; bail to be decided expeditiously.

Shyodan Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:205221

¶2

Court No. - 89

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39430 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Shyodan Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gauri Shanker Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.0916 of 2025 (State Vs. Shyodan Singh) as well as the chargesheet 26.4.2015 submitted by the Investigating Officer arising out of Case Crime No.427 of 2014, under sections 380, 457, 411 IPC, Police Station Khair, District Aligarh and cognizance order dated 31.07.2015 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Aligarh.

¶8

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that applicant shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶12

For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 27.10.2023 SFH

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHIM HUSAIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shyodan Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyodan Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lala Ram Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shan Mohammadand 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Manisha and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sameer Vs State of U.P. and Another

Surendra Rathour and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Amarnath Bind and 7 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another