Disposed

Rohit Niranjan @ Rohit Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Oct 2023A482/38289/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the applicant's challenge to the non-bailable warrant and criminal proceedings. Granting alternative protection for surrender, the Court ordered the warrant kept in abeyance for three weeks and directed expeditious disposal of the bail application per Supreme Court guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Non-bailable warrant kept in abeyance for three weeks; applicant directed to surrender; bail application to be disposed expeditiously.

Rohit Niranjan @ Rohit Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:199532

¶2

Court No. - 89

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38289 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Rohit Niranjan @ Rohit Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar,Brajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P./opposite party no.1 and perused the record.

¶7

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the non-bailable warrant dated 28.06.2023, impugned orders dated 12.07.2023 & 26.08.2023, summoning/cognizance order dated 26.09.2015, as well as proceedings of Case No.2339 of 2015 arising out of Case Crime No.1624 of 2014 (State vs. Gopal Ji Pandey and others), under Section 366 I.P.C., P.S.Konch, District Jalaun pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun.

¶8

At the outset learned counsel for the applicant gave up his challenge to the aforesaid non-bailable warrant and criminal proceedings against the applicant and confined his submission requesting to grant some protection to the applicant to surrender before the concerned court below. The learned counsel for the applicant further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction may be issued to the concerned courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. submits that in case the applicant is not pressing the relief as sought for by him on merits and wants to surrender before the concerned court below, he has no objection if the Court grants protection to him for a short period.

¶10

In view of the above, the relief as sought by the applicant in the instant application is refused.

¶11

However considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by

¶12

learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within three weeks from today and in case he applies for bail, the bail application of the applicant shall be disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law and keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶13

For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned Court below, whichever is earlier, non-bailable warrant dated 28.06.2023 shall be kept in abeyance.

¶14

With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.

¶15

Order Date :- 16.10.2023 SKD

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rohit Niranjan @ Rohit Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Niranjan @ Rohit Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Mohd. Mustafa @ Sannu and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajkumar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Archana Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Sandeep Shahi Vs State of U.P. and Another

Azeem Malik Vs State of U.P. and Another