The applicant withdrew Section 482 CrPC application before hearing. The court dismissed the application and directed the office to return the certified copy of the impugned orders to the counsel.
Application dismissed upon withdrawal by the applicant; certified copy of impugned orders to be returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:182951
Court No. - 86
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32619 of 2023
Applicant :- Sunil Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anjani Kumar Shahwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Antaryami Upadhyay,Salilendu Kumar Upadhyay
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State, Shri Salilendu Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this application and seeks to withdraw it at this stage.
In view of the above statement, this application under Section 482 CrPC is dismissed at this stage
Office is directed to return back the certified copy of the impugned orders to learned counsel for the applicants as per Rules.
Order Date :- 21.9.2023 Nadim
Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Kumar and 2 Others
State of U.P.
Nadim Alam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
