Disposed

Ved Prakash v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC20 Sept 2023A482/31182/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of criminal proceedings was disposed of after the applicant withdrew the quashing prayer. The court directed the applicant to appear in the trial court within three weeks for bail consideration, referring to the Satender Kumar Antil judgment.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed; applicant directed to appear in lower court within three weeks for bail consideration under Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.

Ved Prakash Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:181853

¶2

Court No. - 86

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 31182 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Ved Prakash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Sisodia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 30.9.2022 and cognizance order dated 30.5.2023 as well as entire proceedings of Case No. 2295 of 2023 (State Vs. Vedprakash) arising out of case crime No. 0075 of 2022, under Section 3 and 7 Essential Commodities Act, 1955, P.S. Nawabganj, District- Bareilly, pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ist, Bareilly.

¶8

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the instant application and states that the applicant is ready to appear before the court below and seek his bail and that his release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

¶9

Per contra, learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.

¶10

In view of the above, in case the applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and seeks bail, his release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

¶11

With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed off.

¶12

Order Date :- 20.9.2023

¶13

¶14

Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ved Prakash v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ved Prakash v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murtaza Saleem @ Ali Murtaza Saleem and Another Vs State of U.P. through Secratery Home and Another

Deepak Mahrotra and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. . and Another

Tarun and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Harendra Sharma and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Harsh and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Atul and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another