The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in non-prosecution as the applicant's counsel was absent on the hearing date and sought time to file an ultrasound report.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed in non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30721 of 2022
Applicant :- Gaurav And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shamsher Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicants even on revised call.
Sri Deepak Mishra, learned A.G.A. is present.
On 30.09.2022, the counsel for the applicants was not present even in the revised call and on 29.11.2022, the counsel for the applicants had sought time to file ultra-sound report of the injured.
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed in nonprosecution.
Order Date :- 3.4.2023 Radhika
Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed in non-prosecution due to absent counsel.
Gaurav And 2 Others
Sadhna Rani
Radhika Vishwakarma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
