Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings was dismissed on the ground that it was withdrawn by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2999 of 2023
Applicant :- Aftab Ahmad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
List revised.
Heard Sri Chandan Singh (A/C-0224/2020), Advocate holding brief of Sri Arvind Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri S.B. Maurya, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Aftab Ahmad with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the cognizance/summoning order dated 17.01.2019 and charge sheet No. A-25/2017 dated 25.02.2017 as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 23 of 2019 (State Vs. B.D. Gupta Adhi. Abhi. and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 16 of 2017, under Section 171(c) IPC and Section 123(2) Representation of the People Act, 1950, 1951, 1989, Police Station Ghorawal, District Sonbhadra, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra and with a further prayer to stay the further proceedings in the said case, during the pendency of the present application.
After arguments at length, learned counsel for the applicants states that the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. be dismissed as withdrawn.
Prayer is allowed.
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 7.2.2023 M. ARIF
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aftab Ahmad
State of U.P.
Samit Gopal
Mohammad Arif
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
