there is no evidence that applicant-accused was involved in the alleged forgery in charts or in issuance of alleged forged mark sheet. At the relevant time, the applicant-accused was not posted in the relevant section, which has to deal with the chart of marks or mark sheet. During investigation, the applicant-accused has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of false information that in the year 1997, the applicant was working as Office Superintendent, chart room in-charge as well as ‘Ank chart prabhari’ in relation to B.Sc. 2nd and third year charts of the year 1997. The applicant was not involved in correction of marks after re-valuation and in fact the procedure of re-valuation was not existing in the year 1997. The applicant has never given any B.Sc. 2nd and third year charts to Prof R.D. Katara in the year 19961997. The first information report itself mentions that marks sheet of Rajiv Diwakar did not match with his corrected marks chart of B.Sc third year. The applicant was falsely implicated on false information that in the year 1997 applicant was involved in preparation issuing marks sheet of B.Sc examination of 1997 after re-valuation. The alleged discrepancy in marks of the co-accused rules out any organised act or conspiracy. The applicant has already retired from the service after rendering 35 years of unblemished service. The applicant was posted in chart room of examination department and his job was to prepare duplicate marks sheets. The key of lock of chart room used to remain under custody the Assistant registrar examinations. The applicant has never received charts to keep in chart room. It was further submitted that after 10 years of the declaration of result, the entire documents / charts had been kept in open area of the chart room. The chart room was under direct supervision of Assistant Registrar examination. The chart room has access of all departmental employees. The charts of 1997 B.Sc third year examination as well correction challans have been issued by the
