In an Article 227 matter, the petitioner did not appear to press the petition. The High Court dismissed the matter for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1789 of 2023 Petitioner :- Vikas Yadav Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amar Bahadur Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Case is called out in the revised list. None responds for the petitioner to press the petition. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
It appears that the petitioner has lost interest for some reason in this case.
As none present to press this petition, the same is hereby dismissed for nonprosecution.
Order Date :- 11.10.2023 Sumit Kumar
Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vikas Yadav
State Of U P
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
