The High Court at Lucknow Bench dismissed a writ petition filed against the Board of Revenue as not pressed with liberty to file fresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:63304
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 854 of 2023
Petitioner :- Swati Agarwal And 3 Others Respondent :- Board Of Revenue,U.P., Allahabad Thru. Registrar And 6 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjai Srivastava,Anchit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shashank Shekhar Shukla
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
In view of the incurable defects, Shri Balendra Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sanjai Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh. To which there is no objection by the other side.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid.
Order Date :- 3.10.2023 Ashutosh Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Swati Agarwal And 3 Others
Board Of Revenue,U.P., Allahabad
Rajnish Kumar
Ashutosh Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
