The Allahabad High Court rejected an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of a bailable warrant and summoning order in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that factual discrepancies could be placed before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:47452
Court No. - 12
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6908 of 2023
Applicant :- Rajan Kumar Srivastava Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kaushal Kumar,Vinay Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.5191 of 2021.
Order Date :- 20.7.2023 Amit/-
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed to quash a bailable warrant and summoning order in a Section 138 NI Act case is maintainable when factual inaccuracies in the complaint can be re
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajan Kumar Srivastava
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
