The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution. The court observed that the applicants repeatedly failed to pairvi and pursue the case, which was filed in 2006 but became stale due to inactivity.
Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:47449
Court No. - 12
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2924 of 2006
Applicant :- Smt.Durga And 8 Ors. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
"1. Case is called out.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicants.
3. As the matter is related to the year 2006, list this case in the next week within top ten cases.
4. In case, learned counsel for the applicant fails to assist the Court on the next date, matter shall be decided finally."
Order Date :- 19.7.2023 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 482 CrPC is liable to be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Durga And 8 Ors.
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
