Revisionist sought dismissal of criminal revision petition claiming outside settlement. State opposed. Court dismissed the petition as not pressed by the revisionist.
Criminal revision No. 524 of 2021 dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:49197
Court No. - 29
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 524 of 2021
Revisionist :- Shobhit Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- Satendra Nath Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arvind Kumar Verma
Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.
Sri Satendra Nath Rai, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court, therefore, he does not want to press this revision and the same may be dismissed.
Learned AGA for the State has no objection to aforesaid prayer.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed as not pressed.
[Renu Agarwal,J.]
Order Date :- 26.7.2023 kkv/
Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Renu Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
