Disposed

Arshad Jameel v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrtt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC29 May 2023/5108/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of criminal proceedings. The applicant withdrew the quashing petition and sought liberty to file a bail application in the trial court. The court granted liberty and disposed of the matter.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file bail application in the trial court, subject to appearance within two weeks and expeditious disposal.

Arshad Jameel Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:38440

¶2

Court No. - 28

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5108 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Arshad Jameel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrtt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Raman Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Rajiv Raman Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Nirmal Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

¶7

Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer for quashing the entire proceeding of Criminal Case no. 118434/2022, State Versus Arshad Jameel pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 6, Lucknow arising out from case crime no. 51/2022, under section 406, 504,506, I.P.C. Police Station Dubagga, District Lucknow and as well as summoning order dated 06.12.2022 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 6, Lucknow in pursuance of charge sheet no. 1/2022 dated 22.8.2022 filed in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 6, Lucknow.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.

¶9

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be

¶10

decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51 .

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶12

On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶13

The application is disposed off accordingly.

¶14

Order Date :- 29.5.2023 Mayank

¶15

Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Arshad Jameel v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrtt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arshad Jameel v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrtt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shesh Narain Pandey @ Khedu Pandey Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Sneh Lata @ Shilpi and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Civil Secrett. Lko. and Another

Raj Kumar Pal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Kiran and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Sitaram Yadav and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Jaswant @ Shiva Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Others