The applicant in an application under Section 482 CrPC sought to withdraw the proceeding. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn, granting liberty to seek appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 15
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3952 of 2023
Applicant :- Ramu @ Rajesh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Bhanu Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
Heard Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Vivek Gupta, learned A.G.A. for the State.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant does not want to press the instant application and intends to seek appropriate remedy, which may be available to him in accordance with law.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
Having heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
Office is directed to return the certified copy of this order to the applicant in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 26.4.2023 Raj
Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ramu @ Rajesh
Ajai Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
