A writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or press the case despite the respondent being present.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:45207
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3069 of 2023
Petitioner :- Sant Ram And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girdhari Lal Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta,Santosh Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to their help and there should be end to litigation.
Order Date :- 12.7.2023 Vinay/-
Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sant Ram
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Lavania
Vinay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
