Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the present applicant has been falsely implicated in the case as he has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. As a matter of fact, the present applicant has got married with the prosecutrix and out of said wedlock, they have been blessed with a daughter. Attention has been drawn towards Annexure No.2 of the application, which is an order dated 18.12.2013 passed by this Court in Misc. Bench No.11956 of 2013 wherein the prosecutrix had appeared in the Court and had stated that she has married with the present applicant out of her own free will as both are major, therefore, this Court granted protection to the present applicant. Further attention has been drawn towards Annexure No.4 of the application, which is a statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. wherein she has stated that the present applicant had taken her with him on the basis of false promise of marriage, however, in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. (Annexure No.5), she has narrated the entire story in detail and has not supported the prosecution version as well as her earlier version recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. inasmuch as in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she has stated that she is a major girl and had gone with the present applicant by her free will. She got married with him; thereafter, she gave birth of one female child. She had made complaint against her parents. Therefore, learned counsel for the applicant has stated that in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present applicant may be enlarged on bail. He has further submitted that
