After perusing the record in the light of the submissions made at the bar and after taking an overall view of all the facts and circumstances of this case, nature of evidence, period of detention already undergone, unlikelihood of early conclusion of trial and also in absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence and considering the fact that three weapons, i.e., lathi, danda and axe have been assigned in the hands of seven persons, but there is no any specific allegation against any of the accused including the appellant, even none of the accused including the appellant has been assigned any specific weapon holding in their hands, even none of the injured named any accused that he hit the injured by which weapon and a general role of assaulting has been assigned to all the accused including the present appellant; further as per postmortem report cause of death of the deceased was found to be hemorrhage due to ante mortem injuries and there were only two injuries found on the person of the deceased; there appears force in the submission of learned counsel for the appellant that in absence of any specific role and in absence of any specific weapon assigned to any of the accused including the appellant it is a case of false implication due to village party bandi and rivalry; co-accused, Vineeta Singh and Kaushlendra Singh @ Rajan Singh, who were also not assigned any specific role or any specific weapon, have already been granted bail by this Court, thus, there appears force in the submission of learned counsel for the appellant that case of the present appellant is not on the worse footing than that of the aforesaid co-accused and further considering the
