Saleem v. the State of U.P and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
A single-judge order dismissing an S. 482 application as infructuous due to the passage of time, with liberty to recall. The interim order stands vacated.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous; liberty to recall granted within eight weeks.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:68846
Court No. - 28
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1034 of 2014
Applicant :- Saleem Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Anoop Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out. None present for applicant.
Sri Aniruddha Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State is present.
It seems that by efflux of time, matter has become infructuous.
The application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The applicant is given liberty to file recall application within a period of eight weeks, if he feel that cause of action still survives.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Saleem
- respondent
The State Of U.P And Anr.
Coram
Prakash Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- /1034/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court