In an application under Section 482 CrPC where no party appeared, the High Court dismissed the petition as having become infructuous due to lapse of time and vacated any interim orders.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated; liberty granted to file recall application within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:68845
Court No. - 28
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1030 of 2014
Applicant :- Ahmad Sayyed Ansari Opposite Party :- The Addl Principal Judge. Family Court Lucknow And Ors.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Mishra,Atul Kumar Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Sartaj Ahmad Siddiqui
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out. None present for applicant.
Sri Aniruddha Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State is present.
It seems that by efflux of time, matter has become infructuous.
The application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The applicant is given liberty to file recall application within a period of eight weeks, if he feel that cause of action still survives.
Office is directed to communicate this order to the trial court concerned forthwith.
Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Mayank
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ahmad Sayyed Ansari
The Addl Principal Judge, Family Court Lucknow and Ors.
Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
