The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without expressing an opinion on the merits, on the ground that the reassessment order had already been passed. The order contains no legal analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 561 of 2022
Petitioner :- Mukul Chawla Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Gaurav Mahajan,Gopal Verma
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Sri Vandeep Nath, holding Brief of Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous since reassessment order has already been passed and, therefore, this writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of aforesaid and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case of the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 28.4.2022/vkg
Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI Date: 2022.04.28 17:14:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mukul Chawla
Union Of India
2 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
